Here’s the post where I’m accused of defending Donald Sterling

la-clippers-owner-donald-sterling-allegedly-dropped-the-n-word-when-interviewing-a-coach-in-1983

It’s really a fascinating thing, when you think about it.

Even a culture like ours — a culture dedicated to hedonism and relativism — has to put on a show every once in a while and pretend it has some semblance of a moral standard. It shows you that those philosophers and theologians were actually onto something when they wrote about Natural Law.

Deep down, in the pit of our being, there exists a need to be good and virtuous; but if being good and virtuous is too hard, then at least we need to find a halfway convincing substitute. Only demons and psychotics would stand and openly proclaim their own evil — the rest of us can act the part, but we still feel the urge to get up and play Morality Charades on occasion.

That’s what comes to mind when I see the reaction to the story about Donald Sterling. If you don’t watch the news (and these days I highly recommend that you don’t), I’ll fill you in on THE SCANDAL OF THE CENTURY:

Sterling is an old, crazy, rich, (alleged) racist who happens to own the LA Clippers. Being old, crazy, and rich, and living in California, he also has a pretty progressive love life. He left his wife a while back and started shacking up with his young west coast mistress. Now, his wife has quite unfairly accused the mistress of gold-digging, all because she just so happened to fall madly in love with a rich married man who showered her with Bentleys, diamonds, and cash.

(It happens to the best of us. Stop judging.)

The wife filed a lawsuit against the mistress, and the mistress allegedly swore to ‘get even.’ Getting even, in this case, evidently involved coaxing her lover into making some very inane and very racist comments, while secretly recording the exchange. To give you an idea of just how inane and racist: Sterling allegedly tells his *minority* mistress that he doesn’t mind if she has sex with minorities, but he doesn’t want her to be seen in public with them.

Well, this audio tape SOMEHOW made its way to that bastion of journalistic integrity known as TMZ — although the girlfriend totally had nothing to do with that, she says.

In a normal and sane society, this sordid soap opera would never be discussed outside of gossip magazines and entertainment shows, because there’s nothing very newsworthy about it. A wealthy, morally bankrupt adulterer in Los Angeles professed some unsavory views, behind closed doors, to his manipulative morally bankrupt girlfriend.

Alright.

And?

Donald Sterling can say and think whatever he wants to say and think. Given his situation, I’m not particularly surprised that he says and thinks offensive things. In fact, his overall lifestyle is far more repugnant than his ludicrous statements about black people.

(*Note* this post originally identified his wife as his “ex-wife.” They are not divorced, I was mistaken. This man is publicly breaking his marriage vows, but still we find his discriminatory racial views to be the most offensive thing about him.)

We permit and even celebrate most forms of evil and debauchery in our society, so our Moral Outrage energy is stored, ready to be unleashed anytime an old white guy utters something untoward about minorities. Having removed sins like baby-killing, pornography, sex-trafficking, and infidelity from the ‘Things to Get Upset About’ column, this seems to be among the only universally-recognized evils remaining.

I guess that explains why the media has pushed this to the front of their headlines, and the President of the United States of America took time out of his trip to Asia to bloviate about it.

And, since I love nothing more than to spoil an overdone, media-hyped Outrage Party, I have a few comments of my own to make:

1) President Obama jumped onto this story immediately after the gossip merchants at TMZ broke the ‘news.’ You’d think, as the President of the United States on an important trip overseas, his remarks would be along these lines: “Yeah, that guy said some messed up stuff. Good thing he’s not an elected official, no crime was committed, nobody was hurt, and none of this has any relevance to the lives of any American who isn’t dating Donald Sterling. Next question.”

That’s how a president who respects his office might respond. But a president who never misses an opportunity to reinforce his progressive racial narrative would instead give a lengthy and thorough statement, which includes this little gem: “The United States continues to wrestle with a legacy of race and slavery and segregation that’s still there — the vestiges of discrimination.”

Yes, he really did paint the LA Clipper owner’s ridiculous, private comments to his girlfriend as some kind of symptom of a larger national issue. Donald Sterling’s stupid opinions about minorities couldn’t just be Donald Sterling’s stupid opinions about minorities — it has to be an indication that the legacy of slavery still thrives nationwide. It exists in Donald Sterling’s heart, so therefore it exists in America as a whole; lingering in the air we breathe, infecting our souls, and turning us into Republicans.

Besides, when it comes to commenting on domestic scandals, President Obama will never live down his cowardly refusal to speak out against Kermit Gosnell. Here was a man who, for thirty years, murdered black infants in his Philadelphia abortion clinic, while his activities were allowed to continue because of the complacency and tacit approval of local, state, and federal agencies. Here was a man who segregated his waiting room by race, and gave better, safer treatment to white patients. Here was a man involved in a murderous scandal that implicated — and still implicates — every level of political authority, and resulted in hundreds of born infants being decapitated, stabbed, and drowned in toilets.

What did Obama say about it?

“I can’t comment.” Abortions should be “safe, legal and rare,” he said, but he “can’t comment.”

“I can’t comment.”

The ONE time his comments would be needed, warranted, and appropriate, and he declined

Forget everything else the man has done. Forget everything else he’s said. All you need to know about Barack Obama the man, and Barack Obama the President, can be summed up by the fact that he immediately and forcefully commented when a black Harvard professor was arrested by a white cop; he immediately and forcefully commented when a black teenager was killed by a Hispanic neighborhood watchman; and he immediately and forcefully commented when a white NBA owner allegedly made some insulting comments about black people — but when an abortionist was allowed to murder black infants for thirty years in the middle of an American city, he said nothing.

In all three of the cases where he did comment, the facts weren’t yet fully known, and the incident had no relevance outside of the area where it occurred. In Gosnell’s case, the facts were established, and the incident encompassed a wide range of local, state, and federal authorities. Yet on the first three he pounced, while on the last case he ran for the hills.

That’s all you need to know about Barack Obama.

2. The LA City Council is drafting a resolution calling for the NBA to sanction Sterling, and labeling his comments as, somehow, a violation of ‘human rights.’ Because we all have a human right to… not be insulted by people in the privacy of their homes…?

Really?

The NBA can do whatever it wants here. I don’t care. However, no government authority has any business getting involved in any capacity whatsoever, unless there are laws in Los Angeles against telling your girlfriend not to go to basketball games with Magic Johnson. I don’t think any such law exists, but I know that a California law against secretly recording private conversations does exist. Therefore, interestingly, if the government steps in at all, the law requires them to step in on behalf of Donald Sterling.

But they probably won’t, because we’ve given up on the law, and we’ve given up on free speech. We’ve given up on it so completely that I will be accused of racism simply for making that statement (see: the comments under this post).

3. Al Sharpton is threatening a boycott. I’m still waiting for Al Sharpton to boycott himself for his anti-Jewish comments, anti-gay comments, and anti-Mormon comments. Not to mention the time when he helped stir up racial hysteria over a rape hoax, or the other time he helped stir up racial hysteria over a rape hoax, or the time when he incited black mobs to attack Jews in Crown Heights, or the time when he got involved in drug deals before turning snitch for the FBI. I’m waiting for Sharpton to boycott himself for the crime of being Sharpton — i.e. just an overall lying, shameless, despicable, crook.

4. Various rappers have come out of the wordwork to express their dismay over Sterling’s remarks. It’s impossible to ignore the irony when we get this kind of faux-indignation from the precise people responsible for hurting more black kids in more ways than a thousand Donald Sterlings ever could. Racist NBA owners might result in hurt feelings, but the self-destructive culture peddled by these record industry predators results in funerals and prison time for black inner city children. I’m happy to know that Snoop Dogg — writer of such poetic lyrics as “b*tches ain’t sh*t but hoes and tricks” — thinks that Sterling should be ashamed of his repulsive rhetoric. Now that we know how sensitive Snoop Dogg is, let’s just hope he never listens to a Snoop Dogg song.

Lil Wayne also came forward to register his disapproval. This is the same guy who recently wrote lyrics where he called Emmett Till — the 14 year old black kid murdered for flirting with a white woman in the 50’s — a ‘p*ssy.’

But Mr. Wayne is, you know, super sensitive to the historical plight of black Americans.

5. If anything should come of this ordeal, it ought to finally be the complete dismantling of the NAACP. The organization was scheduled to give Sterling a SECOND ‘lifetime achievement award’ in a few weeks. They’ve since rescinded, but their backtrack doesn’t get them off the hook. If Sterling really has a lifetime of achieving things in the name of civil rights and racial tolerance, wouldn’t they perhaps be a little hesitant to throw the guy under the bus? They sure seem to have cut Sharpton a ton of slack. But if he was only going to be given the honor because he’s a wealthy guy and the NAACP is nothing but a political arm of the Democrat Party, then the move makes sense. So which is it, NAACP? Are you betraying this man who, as you formerly claimed, has dedicated an entire lifetime (TWO lifetimes, in fact) to achieving racial unity, or are you a bunch of Democrat shills doling out political favors?

Hmmm, this is quite the perplexing riddle, isn’t it?

6. Sterling is a jerk. There’s no doubt about that. But I am extremely uncomfortable with seeing a guy get penalized for private, illegally recorded comments he made. Even if I find the comments to be abhorrent, I just don’t like how it feels when we take somebody down based on something they said in their living rooms, off the record.

I’m consistent about this, too. When liberal Alec Baldwin was recorded berating his daughter a few years ago, I said we should be angry at what he’s said publicly, but what he said privately to his family is none of our business. When Mel Gibson was crucified for screaming at his girlfriend a while back, I said the same thing. Now, I repeat those sentiments.

There is not a person on this planet who hasn’t made ‘offensive statements’ to their loved ones, privately, in their own homes. I’ve never said the things Sterling said, because I’m not a senile, adulterous, racist, but I’m sure I’ve made comments to my wife or my close friends that I wouldn’t make in a business meeting, or on TV, or on Facebook.

It’s a troubling precedent when we start penalizing people for essentially being entrapped, illegally, by an intimate confidant. The NBA might have the authority to ban Sterling for life and force the sale of his team, but the move is nonetheless problematic.

Go ahead, get emotional and tell me I’m making excuses for Sterling. I’m not. I only hope that nobody has to make excuses for you one day if your private conversations are illegally dumped into the public square.

This is a steep and slippery slope.

*****

Find me on Facebook.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

762 Responses to Here’s the post where I’m accused of defending Donald Sterling

  1. JD Brink says:

    Well said sir!

  2. Brian Boeckenhauer says:

    OK people. I refuse to judge anyone on their opinions or beliefs, all I can state is my beliefs. I won’t voice all of my beliefs because that would take a lifetime.
    I believe that definition of good and bad doesn’t have a cultural, religious, sexuality, gender, or racial profile. The reason for my beliefs are a direct result of my own personal experiences. Now that I’ve said that, I confess that I am in fact prejudiced. I am not ashamed to admit it. By now you might be wondering what I might be prejudiced towards. Character. After all, it is our character that defines us, and as such my prejudice towards others will always be dealt with on an individual basis.
    My whole point?
    If you’re ever going to make the world a better place you should start with building your personal character to a level that

  3. karenhyatt says:

    Thank you so much for the excellent post. So glad to know there are other people willing to cut through the media hype and see this ridiculous “news” story for what it is. Great job.

  4. I’ll first defend the comments about the President (any President) – The commander in chief can do and comment on whatever he feels like commenting on whenever he feels like it. Day to day, I’ve got to believe there’s 10,000 things he should comment on that he just doesn’t…. So be pissed, because you’ll be pissed again I’m certain.

    The freedom of speech is not the point either, though many have had this reaction to the events that have occurred. Privacy notwithstanding, when you get outed, it is what it is. Shameful, sad, unfortunate, deceitful or even illegal, call it what you want? Ask Mit Romney about being unknowingly taped in a private setting? Mayor Marion Barry proclaimed too that he was set up! So what – he still was smoking crack! The point is after you’ve been outed to the public, the reaction by the public is either the spoils or the riches (see Kim Kardashian)…..

    • Jared says:

      What you said about Obama is the same thing you can say about sterling according to law. Sterling SHOULD have the right to “do and comment on whatever he feels like commenting on whenever he feels like it”. Only difference is the NBA has a bylaw that allows them to boot any owner no matter what the issue. Mit Romney was in a room with 30 other people with intentions to influence their opinion…not private. Marion Barry committed an illegal ACTION…not a belief.

      You do realize a large portion of this country was founded by settlers who came to America for freedom of their beliefs?? The United States constitution would later protect this fundamental human right in the FIRST Amendment. Until now…. http://www.cnn.com/2014/04/29/us/clippers-sterling-scandal/

  5. Steve Berman says:

    We are as addicted to personal wickedness and numb to actual morality as a crack addict who needs more and more of the drug to feel the same high. What will it take to break through our hypocrisy immunity?

    Maybe if someone taped Gore laughing a hysterically sinister laugh while stoking a dirty coal-fired oven belching black smoke while telling Colin Powell he can get another rack of ribs for the fire, it might be a high enough dose of hypocrisy for us to feel it.

    http://thanks-project.blogspot.com/2014/04/whistling-past-graveyard.html

  6. Kyle Samuelson says:

    So apparently the recordings weren’t illegal; Sterling has been having his conversations recorded, at his own request, for the past couple years. That makes this whole post null.

    • “So apparently the recordings weren’t illegal; Sterling has been having his conversations recorded, at his own request, for the past couple years. That makes this whole post null.”

      Hello.

      Let’s see Matt said concerning Obama’s offering his opinion about past racist events, “In all three of the cases where he did comment, the facts weren’t yet fully known,” Your whole article said a lot about who you are as you said about Obama. Mind you, I am not an Obamabot since I didn’t vote for the fella…but I wouldn’t vote for you as being the best blogger on the internet either. Ugh, this is the second article i actually read of yours. I came here via “Wretched.” I immediately recognized your photo but out of curiosity I proceeded to continue reading. It’s hard to deal with liberal Christians, it’s harder dealing with conservative Right wing Christians. There was a whole lot of focusing on other black “leader”, black entertainers, black on black crime…Ugh, you appeared to be an apologetic of the darnest things racist white people say.

  7. Pingback: Everyone else is covering Donald Sterling, so why can’t I? | theharlowreport

  8. Denise Allis says:

    My husband and I have both wondered why this private conversation, taped with only one other person in the room, has been made such a huge issue. And..as you say..why our President wants to be a part of it all. He did not swear or curse. He did not yell or threaten. He did not do anything illegal. He asked nicely that she honor his wishes in their relationship…strange as it is that he’s ok with her sleeping with ANYONE in private other than him. It’s a private matter. It is not a team matter.

  9. Carrie Berkman says:

    I agree 100%.

  10. Catherine says:

    Never read Matt Walsh before but just wanted to comment on a great article. Is this the conversation on race that Eric Holder referred to? It was very enlightening.

  11. Mark says:

    Can we ban ExxonMobil CEO Rex Tillerson for life for suing to keep fracking away from his back yard or does now nobody know what I am talking about???

  12. Jacob says:

    I agree 99.9% only thing i would say is he’s a bigot, not a racist. there is a difference.

  13. WELL written!!! This highlights OTHER problems that the NBA has had for YEARS!!! They’ll fine and ban someone saying something PRIVATELY, but yet they don’t lift a finger to do anything about the dug users, the wife beaters, the rapists who are considered PROFESSIONAL’s who kids look up? Talk about a double standard.

  14. m.e. says:

    If I had a media outlet like you I would have said the same thing. (maybe even a little stronger)
    This country is full of hypocrites of ALL races that act like they don’t say negative things about other people, religion, race, political standings etc. in the privacy of their homes. (and expect privacy)
    I think this give Mr. Sterling grounds for civil suite or the DA charges her criminally recording without consent for personal gain.
    M.E.

  15. armenia4ever says:

    A very interesting and well articulated post about this whole debacle.

    One thing I’ve noticed is that it has become entirely acceptable to absolutely trash people and call for their heads, depending on the overall societal opinion/stance on what they said.

    What he said was obviously pretty damn racist, as well as his actions in the past, but I feel like we are noticing a trend where someone says something – context or not – where we go after them and try to cost them their job, career, ect.

    Lets go with Public Enemy #1. Racism. Even if someone is a vitriol racist, do they deserve to lose their house, family, career, go homeless, ect.? If we aren’t careful about how we start treating people we are going to create actual racists and make race reconciliation even harder then it is.

    Side note: I’m half white, so you all better watch out if you insult me… Nah, just kidding.

  16. abooth08 says:

    KISSNBOOTH.WORDPRESS.COM

  17. Its freedom of speech, I don’t care for it at all but as long as you are not directly effecting the lives of others say what you wanna you can defend Donald Sterling if you want to don’t re-track your thoughts for the haters,

  18. Tanna lim says:

    Dude, freakin excellent post. Kareem, espn’s bomani jones and others have echoed similar sentiments. The Gosnell aspect is disgusting. It’s amazing that anyone could say the Cambridge police acted stupidly before the facts emerged and be so steeped in his ideology that he can’t step back and see how horrific the Gosnell case was.

  19. Dude, you are so right. God bless you for coming out and standing up for the truth.

  20. Pingback: Clippers Owner Sterling Banished For Racist Remarks: No Forgiveness Possible | Lost Little Lutheran

  21. Richy Minks says:

    I don’t believe that I read all of this. I also read some of the comments as well. Nobody on this thing understands racism and what the conversation revealed. Please click the youtube link below and get a similar take but with more substance.

Comments are closed.